📈 Life Insurance as the “New Bond”: Re-thinking the 40

For decades, advisors leaned on the 60/40 (60% equities / 40% bonds) because bonds offered yield and price appreciation as rates trended down for ~40 years. That structural tailwind is gone—or at least much weaker—so it’s rational to ask: What should play the “stability sleeve” now? (Translation: If bonds don’t stabilize like they used to, what does?)

1) Why Bonds Worked Then—and Why That Era’s Different

Bond math 101. Long-term yields ≈ expected average future short rates + term premium. When the Fed pushed rates from double-digits in the early 1980s to near-zero by the 2010s, the expected path of short rates kept falling; long yields followed lower, and existing bonds rose in price. That was the golden age of duration. (Plain-speak: Rates fell for decades, so bond prices rose for decades.) (Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

Today’s regime. Short rates jumped off the floor, inflation risk re-emerged, and the stock-bond relationship turned positive in 2022—an ugly combo that blindsided classic 60/40. Even large shops now concede 2022 was a historical outlier for 60/40 pain. (Plain-speak: Bonds and stocks went down together—ouch.) (Vanguard)

2) Tax Friction: Bonds vs. Life Insurance Cash Value

Bonds: Coupon interest is taxed annually at ordinary income rates (Treasuries: federal-taxable, state-exempt; corporates/munis vary). That annual drag compounds against you. (Plain-speak: You pay taxes every year on bond interest.) (IRS)

Properly structured cash-value life insurance (under IRC §7702):

  • Tax-deferred accumulation.

  • Basis withdrawals tax-free; policy loans generally tax-free if the policy stays in force and you avoid MEC pitfalls.

  • Income-tax-free death benefit. (Plain-speak: Grow quietly; access smartly; pass on tax-free.) (Investopedia)

3) Risk/Return: IRR with Built-In Utilities Bonds Don’t Have

When you compare after-tax bond yields to policy IRR over 10–30 years, well-designed WL/IUL can be competitive—plus you get:

  • Living benefits (LTC/chronic/critical illness riders where available).

  • Guaranteed death benefit (a built-in liquidity event at precisely the moment families need it).

  • Optional liquidity via loans/withdrawals while the remaining cash value keeps compounding. (Plain-speak: It’s yield + safety nets + flexible access.)

And many designs include floors (e.g., IUL crediting won’t post negative—often a 0% floor—though caps/participation rates apply). Floors don’t exist in nominal bond prices when rates jump. (North American Company)

4) Duration, Liquidity, and “Don’t Make Me Sell at a Loss”

Bonds lock in duration risk; if you sell early after a rate spike, you crystallize losses (see 2022). Life insurance CVallows borrowing against the asset—access without forcing a sale. (Plain-speak: Keep the compounding engine on and still tap cash.)

5) Sequence-of-Returns Buffer (An Overlooked Use Case)

The policy’s non-correlated nature can act as a spending buffer during equity drawdowns—drawing from CV instead of selling stocks low. That improves retirement durability in many simulations. (Plain-speak: Use policy dollars in bad years; let the portfolio heal.) (Brix Partners)

6) Correlation Reality Check

The “stocks down / bonds up” comfort blanket isn’t guaranteed. Correlations are regime-dependent (inflation/rate shocks can push both down together). This was the story in 2022, challenging 60/40’s stabilizer role. (Plain-speak: Diversification didn’t “fail”; the regime changed.) (Russell Investments)

7) Legacy, Timing, and Planning Optionality

Bonds end when you redeem or die. A policy’s tax-free death benefit creates immediate, timed liquidity for heirs and estate costs—something a bond ladder can approximate but not replicate with the same tax profile. (Plain-speak: It’s stability and legacy in one chassis.)

Where Life Insurance Can Be the “Better Bond” (And Caveats)

When it shines

  • You’re in a moderate/high tax bracket (annual coupon taxation hurts). (IRS)

  • You value downside-guardrails (e.g., 0% IUL floor) and optionality (loans vs. forced sales). (North American Company)

  • You want a sequence-risk buffer in retirement distributions. (Brix Partners)

  • Estate goals matter (tax-free DB, probate bypass under typical rules). (Investopedia)

What to watch

  • Design risk: Avoid MECs if you want tax-free access; structure premiums/face appropriately. (Plain-speak: Good design > sales pitch.) (Investopedia)

  • Insurer credit risk / expenses: Carriers vary; policy charges are real—compare net IRR, not just illustrated rates.

  • IUL mechanics: Caps/pars/spreads and policy loans affect realized returns. Floors ≠ guarantees of any specific long-term return. (North American Company)

Bottom Line

The old 60/40 leaned on a once-in-a-generation falling-rate backdrop. In a world with stickier inflation risk, uncertain policy paths, and regime-shifting correlations, properly structured cash-value life insurance can play a compelling role as the “new 40”—a tax-advantaged, option-rich, and non-correlated stabilizer that bonds alone may no longer provide.

(Plain-speak: If you used to park your “safe” dollars in bonds, it’s worth testing what a well-built policy could do instead—especially after taxes.)

Quick fact-check notes (answering your question directly)

  • “Bonds trail the fed funds rate” → Not mechanically true. Long yields reflect expected future short rates plus a term premium. They often move with policy shifts, but the relationship is expectations-driven, not a simple lag. (Federal Reserve Bank of New York)

  • “Falling rates helped bonds for decades” → Yes. The 1980s–2010s downtrend delivered income and price gains. 2022 showed the flip side when rates jumped and both stocks and bonds dropped. (Vanguard)

  • “Bonds are taxed annually; CV can be tax-advantaged” → Correct (ordinary income on bond interest; §7702 framework for policies). (IRS)

If you want, I can tailor this to WL-only, IUL-only, or a WL/IUL blend, and drop in a small table that compares after-tax bond yield vs illustrative net policy IRR across brackets (with clear disclaimers).

Next
Next

What If You Could Fire Your Bank? A Libertarian Case for Banking on Yourself