đ Life Insurance as the âNew Bondâ: Re-thinking the 40
For decades, advisors leaned on the 60/40 (60% equities / 40% bonds) because bonds offered yield and price appreciation as rates trended down for ~40 years. That structural tailwind is goneâor at least much weakerâso itâs rational to ask: What should play the âstability sleeveâ now? (Translation: If bonds donât stabilize like they used to, what does?)
1) Why Bonds Worked Thenâand Why That Eraâs Different
Bond math 101. Long-term yields â expected average future short rates + term premium. When the Fed pushed rates from double-digits in the early 1980s to near-zero by the 2010s, the expected path of short rates kept falling; long yields followed lower, and existing bonds rose in price. That was the golden age of duration. (Plain-speak: Rates fell for decades, so bond prices rose for decades.) (Federal Reserve Bank of New York)
Todayâs regime. Short rates jumped off the floor, inflation risk re-emerged, and the stock-bond relationship turned positive in 2022âan ugly combo that blindsided classic 60/40. Even large shops now concede 2022 was a historical outlier for 60/40 pain. (Plain-speak: Bonds and stocks went down togetherâouch.) (Vanguard)
2) Tax Friction: Bonds vs. Life Insurance Cash Value
Bonds: Coupon interest is taxed annually at ordinary income rates (Treasuries: federal-taxable, state-exempt; corporates/munis vary). That annual drag compounds against you. (Plain-speak: You pay taxes every year on bond interest.) (IRS)
Properly structured cash-value life insurance (under IRC §7702):
Tax-deferred accumulation.
Basis withdrawals tax-free; policy loans generally tax-free if the policy stays in force and you avoid MEC pitfalls.
Income-tax-free death benefit. (Plain-speak: Grow quietly; access smartly; pass on tax-free.) (Investopedia)
3) Risk/Return: IRR with Built-In Utilities Bonds Donât Have
When you compare after-tax bond yields to policy IRR over 10â30 years, well-designed WL/IUL can be competitiveâplus you get:
Living benefits (LTC/chronic/critical illness riders where available).
Guaranteed death benefit (a built-in liquidity event at precisely the moment families need it).
Optional liquidity via loans/withdrawals while the remaining cash value keeps compounding. (Plain-speak: Itâs yield + safety nets + flexible access.)
And many designs include floors (e.g., IUL crediting wonât post negativeâoften a 0% floorâthough caps/participation rates apply). Floors donât exist in nominal bond prices when rates jump. (North American Company)
4) Duration, Liquidity, and âDonât Make Me Sell at a Lossâ
Bonds lock in duration risk; if you sell early after a rate spike, you crystallize losses (see 2022). Life insurance CVallows borrowing against the assetâaccess without forcing a sale. (Plain-speak: Keep the compounding engine on and still tap cash.)
5) Sequence-of-Returns Buffer (An Overlooked Use Case)
The policyâs non-correlated nature can act as a spending buffer during equity drawdownsâdrawing from CV instead of selling stocks low. That improves retirement durability in many simulations. (Plain-speak: Use policy dollars in bad years; let the portfolio heal.) (Brix Partners)
6) Correlation Reality Check
The âstocks down / bonds upâ comfort blanket isnât guaranteed. Correlations are regime-dependent (inflation/rate shocks can push both down together). This was the story in 2022, challenging 60/40âs stabilizer role. (Plain-speak: Diversification didnât âfailâ; the regime changed.) (Russell Investments)
7) Legacy, Timing, and Planning Optionality
Bonds end when you redeem or die. A policyâs tax-free death benefit creates immediate, timed liquidity for heirs and estate costsâsomething a bond ladder can approximate but not replicate with the same tax profile. (Plain-speak: Itâs stability and legacy in one chassis.)
Where Life Insurance Can Be the âBetter Bondâ (And Caveats)
When it shines
Youâre in a moderate/high tax bracket (annual coupon taxation hurts). (IRS)
You value downside-guardrails (e.g., 0% IUL floor) and optionality (loans vs. forced sales). (North American Company)
You want a sequence-risk buffer in retirement distributions. (Brix Partners)
Estate goals matter (tax-free DB, probate bypass under typical rules). (Investopedia)
What to watch
Design risk: Avoid MECs if you want tax-free access; structure premiums/face appropriately. (Plain-speak: Good design > sales pitch.) (Investopedia)
Insurer credit risk / expenses: Carriers vary; policy charges are realâcompare net IRR, not just illustrated rates.
IUL mechanics: Caps/pars/spreads and policy loans affect realized returns. Floors â guarantees of any specific long-term return. (North American Company)
Bottom Line
The old 60/40 leaned on a once-in-a-generation falling-rate backdrop. In a world with stickier inflation risk, uncertain policy paths, and regime-shifting correlations, properly structured cash-value life insurance can play a compelling role as the ânew 40ââa tax-advantaged, option-rich, and non-correlated stabilizer that bonds alone may no longer provide.
(Plain-speak: If you used to park your âsafeâ dollars in bonds, itâs worth testing what a well-built policy could do insteadâespecially after taxes.)
Quick fact-check notes (answering your question directly)
âBonds trail the fed funds rateâ â Not mechanically true. Long yields reflect expected future short rates plus a term premium. They often move with policy shifts, but the relationship is expectations-driven, not a simple lag. (Federal Reserve Bank of New York)
âFalling rates helped bonds for decadesâ â Yes. The 1980sâ2010s downtrend delivered income and price gains. 2022 showed the flip side when rates jumped and both stocks and bonds dropped. (Vanguard)
âBonds are taxed annually; CV can be tax-advantagedâ â Correct (ordinary income on bond interest; §7702 framework for policies). (IRS)
If you want, I can tailor this to WL-only, IUL-only, or a WL/IUL blend, and drop in a small table that compares after-tax bond yield vs illustrative net policy IRR across brackets (with clear disclaimers).